The fact that H had made a ‘bad bargain’ cannot be taken into account when interpreting a consent order made in financial proceedings. So held the CA in proceedings following the unexpectedly slow sale of the former matrimonial home. The consent order had left no space for a further dispute about money or rights in …
Continue reading “Consent orders – interpretation”
This article is only available to subscribers.
More in this issue
- ADR – The Family Solutions Initiative
- Airbnb – owner liable for party
- Ban on evictions – extended
- Brexit – sole domicile
- Claimant died – take care
- CLC – risk agenda
- Coercive control – Scott schedules
- Costs – contentious probate
- Costs – fraud allegations
- Court practice – security
- Covid-19 jab – can employers insist?
- CPR – moved
- Electrical safety regulations – in force
- Evidence – identification
- Evidence – joint experts
- Financial remedies – interim maintenance
- Financial remedies – maintenance pending suit
- Frustration – terminating rights in land
- HMLR – electronic signatures of deeds
- HMLR – evidence of identity summary
More in this category
- Adoption – Covid-19
- ADR – The Family Solutions Initiative
- Brexit – sole domicile
- Children – DOL
- Children – faith placement
- Children – Hague Convention
- Children – Hague Convention; asylum
- Children – statutory complaints
- Coercive control – Scott schedules
- Costs – fraud allegations
- Financial remedies – conduct
- Financial remedies – interim maintenance
- Financial remedies – maintenance pending suit
- Litigation funding – new guide
This category can only be viewed by members.