The Practical Lawyer

Home
About
CPD
Subscribe
Contact
Land

Overage – non-compliance

A recent case involved an overage agreement whereby seller sold land (which had planning permission) to buyer. The sale agreement allowed seller ten months in which to get planning permission for an increased square footage (upon which the overage payment would become due).  

Subscribers only...
 

Right to ‘enter’ – right to ‘inspect’?

A property owner had the right to ‘enter with workmen, tools and materials on adjoining land… for the purpose of effecting maintenance, repair and decoration’.  

Subscribers only...
 

Right of way – to other property?

Can a right of way granted to plot A be used to access plot B? The normal answer will be ‘no’ – the right of way will benefit plot A (the dominant land) only.  

Subscribers only...
 

Leases – basement extensions

There is still a legal presumption that ‘he who owns the soil owns up to heaven and down to hell’. But, how does that work in the context of a leaseholder who wants to dig down and create a basement extension?

Subscribers only...
 

Adverse possession – registered proprietor?

The Upper Tribunal has said that a registered proprietor can never be in adverse possession of the land.  

Subscribers only...
 

Right of way – obstruction by gate?

If your land is subject to a right of way, then you may be able to erect a gate without that being a ‘substantial interference’ with the right of way.

Subscribers only...
 

Money laundering – overseas ownership

As a result of the fourth money laundering directive the government has issued fresh proposals for the registration of land ownership by overseas entities (whether individuals or not).

Subscribers only...
 

Freehold – flying

How would you define a ‘freehold’? A good starting point would be to say that it means non-time-limited ownership of land, descending down to the centre of the earth and ascending up to the sky (as far as necessary for the ordinary beneficial use of the land).

Subscribers only...
 

Restrictive covenant – modification

It may be argued that a restrictive covenant should be modified or discharged under s84 LPA 1925 because it is obsolete (s84(1)(a)) or that it impedes a reasonable use of the land (s84(1)(aa)). But, if the argument is that the covenant impedes some reasonable use of the land, the tribunal will need to satisfy itself that the covenant:

Subscribers only...
 

Rates – update

Two unrelated points to note:

Subscribers only...
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 58

Most-read articles

Resources

IAG International
Join the IBA now!
MSI Global Alliance
www.totallylegal.com
In House Lawyer